Home
Terrence "Not Johnny" Chan [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
terrencechan

Site Meter

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| Play at PokerStars ]

Site Meter [Jan. 1st, 2020|12:00 am]




Site Meter


Link1 comment|Leave a comment

Event #57: $10000 World Championship of No-Limit Hold'em [Jul. 6th, 2009|11:53 am]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Location |Las Vegas, NV]

So, a pretty strong start to the main event of the 2009 WSOP. Actually, after the first two levels, it was a great start. I had 47000 at the first break (despite having folded AA and AK/top pair on the river already) and 63000 at the second break. The 63000 was enough to get me in 7th on the in-house leaderboard. The 67075 I finished the end of the day with, however, was good for just 215th.

But I will take it. I will take any day where almost nothing really bad happens. I only lost one big pot; in the last level of the day where my lone opponent flopped a set against my overpair. He seemed like a good player (I just got moved there), so I felt the need to pay him off. I made exactly one bluff all day, when I missed a double-gutshot (which also picked up a weak flush draw on the turn). But the vast majority of my chips were courtesy of the fast train from Value Town. The first couple levels of the main event this year are amazing. 300 BB to start. I'm not generally a big fan of playing a bunch of crappy hands to "outplay people after the flop", but that's exactly what you can do as a good player in the main event, since people are truly awful. I played so many hands in the first four hours that I can't possibly retell them all, but rest assured there were some serious atrocities against poker.

It's actually quite simple to play well on the first day of the main event: Get value against bad players, and play passively against the good players. That last part will sound weird, but there's really no reason to put your chips at serious risk against the good players, if they are a minority at your table. It's definitely worth sacrificing some value to them to not play the game of chicken, and get value from the idiots. At any other event, simply playing weak against the good players will get you crushed, but if you get a good starting table in the main event, I'm sure it's correct.

It really can't be overstated how much value the bad players provide. Many of them will just call you down with any pair. Others will just fold everything. But most valuable of all is how terrified they are of value-betting. I lost many pots that should have cost me many more chips. I heard many Day 1 stories about people checking back sets in position, or shoving for 20 times the pot with aces "so they don't get cracked". Stories of people accidentally exposing their hands, people betting the wrong amount and trying to take it back. You name it, there's a story about it. Dinner breaks are a constant battle of oneupmanship of who has witnessed the worst play at their table.

Towards the end of the day, the game started to be somewhat tougher. Not only do the worst of the players usually bust out, but also, bad players tend to start to get better when they get short. They are less likely to liberally flat-call raises or open-limp, or pay off big bets with mediocre hands. They may get more dangerous as they decide their best play is to simply move in (and often they are right). More importantly, they start mimicking the people with chips -- and these are usually the people who open with raises, 3-bet over people, and play well post-flop.

So I don't expect Day 2 to be as easy, but then again, we start Day 2 playing the equivalent of a 100-200 cash game. It's not supposed to be *that* easy. For my part, this is my first main event Day 2 since 2004. I wouldn't mind making it my first Day 3, ever.
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

Reasons to love the main event [Jul. 4th, 2009|06:38 pm]
[Tags|, ]

From today's Pokernews coverage of the main event:

Hoyt Corkins limped for 300 before another player behind him made it 950. It was passed back around to Corkins who moved all in for 19,875 and was called by {A-Spades} {J-Diamonds}. Corkins flipped a dominating {A-Hearts} {K-Clubs} which held on a {K-Diamonds} {10-Hearts} {9-Clubs} {6-Clubs} {10-Spades} board.


Wow. That guy paid TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS to enter this tournament.

There are probably worse hands that have been reported; I haven't been refreshing that industriously today.
Link9 comments|Leave a comment

Aaaaand now... [Jul. 4th, 2009|02:06 am]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Location |Las Vegas, NV]

...the maaaaaaaaain event.... offfffff the year!

It was of course fun for me as an MMA fan when Bruce Buffer announced the "Shuffle Up And Deal" for the 5k 6-max NLHE. And in the words of Mr. Buffer, "iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit's TIME! ...For the main event" of the year. As I said previously, it's never a bad WSOP until you're out of the main event. For my part, on Sunday (Day 1C) I will be at Table 78, Seat 3 to begin the 2009 World Championship of No-Limit Hold'em.

Since in the last two WSOP entries I've talked about how I made one or more significant mistakes, I am hereby declaring the main event mistake-free. This is sort of like the idea behind the Mike Matusow "No Blow-Ups" t-shirt, except that I never ever "blow up" in an epic fashion like Mike, but rather just sort of play hands in a mildly spewy way. Nevertheless, I am using this space to declare that I will not make any big mistakes in the main event. Since I know that I will be blogging about any big mistake I might make, this hopefully will serve as a sufficient deterrent to poor play. (Apparently amillion-dollar prize pool in the $5k 6-max was insufficient.)

Speaking of the 5k 6-max, holyfuckinggod did Hoss_TBF own that shit! I am so happy that our house picked up its second bracelet of the year and fifth overall. We also have three million-dollar cashes. Of course, I am responsible for precisely none of those. Non-bracelet holders are starting to become an endangered species in the house, with just Kenny Shei and I remaining. (Arbitrage alert: At some point last night, Bill Chen set the line on next-to-bracelet at "Terrence -160, Kenny +200.")

As if yesterday wasn't crazy enough with Matt's bracelet and million-dollar win, it was also the Vegas leg of my good friend Mike Johnson's (of the 2+2 PokerCast) bachelor party. It is well-known that publicizing details of bachelor parties is strictly verboten, but we had great fun go-karting (I finished 2nd of 16, always the bridesmaid), having dinner at N19E (or however the hell you spell it), gambling as quickly as possible, and by the end of the night the sun was up and I smelled like cigarettes and perfume.

Until Sunday!
LinkLeave a comment

Final hosings [Jul. 1st, 2009|01:24 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Location |Las Vegas, NV]

Event #55: $2500 2-7 Triple Draw

Last year, this was a fantastic event, full of idiots who really had no idea how to play the game at all. I had two of them on my table last year. This year, Gavin (who plays a lot of triple draw online and live) looked at my table and told me the only two people sitting down were very very good 2-7 players. The table was rounded out by Steve Sung and another pro named Gary. A lot of reports from friends indicated their tables were tough, too. It was pretty tough going for a while. At the first break, Steve had shown down four wheels and was the only play above par. By dinner, his wheel count was up to seven and he was the only player at the table over 8000 chips (I was second with 7700). And he had made a #2 and lost.

Marcel Luske and Dennis Phillips both joined the #6 seat and neither spent much time there. I peaked at about 11000 but late in Level 5 and the table started getting much better, but I busted by just hitting pair-pair-pair-pair in every hand I played. It is pretty frustrating when all you get dealt is hands like 44225 and you still manage to keep pairing. What do these guys even have?

Event #56: $5000 6-max No Limit Hold'em

First off, I will note that this event got 928 players. Nine hundred and twenty-eight. For a $5000 buy-in event at the end of the World Series, where liquidity is at its worst. Event #15, the $5000 NL, got 655 players and it started on a Saturday. This tournament started on a Tuesday. I don't ever want to hear from anyone ever again that people don't like to play shorthanded hold'em.

I was really excited to play this event. Unfortunately I got cute early on and paid for it. At 50-100, I opened utg for 300 with AsKs. Really loose guy on my left calls with about 6k behind. Folded to the SB who makes it 1400. I decide to flat-call and hope that the guy on my left shoves, or that the SB is squeezing with air. But the guy on my left folds. The flop comes AQ5 with two diamonds. SB bets 2700 with about 7000 behind. I again think about shoving but call. The turn is a Q, which puts out a second flush draw and he checks. I shove, which I'm not sure is right, and he snap calls with AQ. The argument for checking is that I probably don't double him up if he has AQ, and also I get to induce a bluff (or maybe a value bet from an exuberant AJ). The argument against is if he's fucking around with something that has a flush draw in it, he doesn't get to get there. The arguments for checking probably outweigh betting. Oh well.

I'm pretty disappointed that I just didn't 4-bet preflop like a normal person, but I am often overly in love with seeing flops in position.

****

Well, the WSOP is almost over. The good news is that as long as you haven't busted out of the main event, you can't officially declare it a bad World Series. Of course, I need to finish like 50th to break even for the Series...
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

Event #52: $3000 Triple Chance No-Limit Hold'em [Jun. 28th, 2009|05:50 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Location |Las Vegas, NV]

I'm reeeeeeeaally glad this is the last 10-handed NLHE tournament I will be playing until the main event. I mean, 10-handed NLHE tournaments are by far the most profitable tournaments you can play during the WSOP, but that assumes you have the patience to play them well. Today was only my third regular vanilla ten-handed NLHE tournament of the series, but I think I have hit my threshold for being sick of them.

I actually played my best for like, 3.5 hours. Then something just snapped, and I found myself shoving with 99 over a guy who was clearly marked with a range that crushes 99. This after I actually made a laydown of JJ preflop (which ironically turned out to be "wrong" because I was against AQ and 99). I also had aces cracked in the first level by Eli Elizra's KQ on a Q-high flop. I had all these things to conspired to bust me, but I didn't bust, then I decided to just kind of bust myself.

In other news, Eli gave me 4:1 on the US to win after Brazil scored the 2-2 goal. I kinda feel like I had the best of it considering the US was a 4:1 dog at the beginning of the game...

Tomorrow: 2-7 triple draw. 6-handed limit tournament, yay!
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

Event #50: $1500 Limit Hold'em Shootout [Jun. 27th, 2009|02:42 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Location |Las Vegas, NV]

I had a fantastic table draw for the $1500 LHE shootout. Aside from Thomas Keller who seemed to be in really rough shape, there was maybe one other guy at the table who could beat 3/6 limit on Stars. The guy who had 50% of the chips on the table when I busted was open-limping into pots and once checked behind second set on the river with no flush and only a really improbable straight possible. It was as good a table as you could hope for, but all day long I never made any draw, never got over 7000 chips, and was bounced before dinner.

Today's donkament sold out before I was able to buy in. On one hand I'm disappointed since it's easy to cash in these things and they are worth so much; on the other hand there's a fantastic chance I would have just played spewy and busted out in the first hour. Better to wait for tomorrow's $3000 "triple chance" tournament. In this vein, a thought occurred to me during lunch today: normally the rebuy tournaments in the WSOP are fantastic value because of all the people attempting to buy a bracelet. But it an absolute tragedy that there are no rebuy tournaments this year with all the huge bracelet bets going around! These tournaments were great value when the only external value for a bracelet was ego and some sponsorship money. Now it's actually correct for people to play like spewboxes in the rebuy period, and the rebuy tournaments get nixed. :(

Only three more events ($3k NL, $2500 2-7 and $5000 NL 6-max) until the main event for me. I'm glad it's going to <teddykgb> "all be over soon" </teddykgb>, but I'm also a little disappointed there is so little remaining time for redemption (i.e. getting unstuck).
LinkLeave a comment

Event 48: $1500 Pot-Limit Omaha 8-or-better [Jun. 25th, 2009|06:45 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Location |Las Vegas, NV]

Before today's event, all six of us in the house -- Bill Chen, Gavin Griffin, Matt Hawrilenko, Kenny Shei, new bracelet holder Jerrod Ankenman and myself all played some 3-on-3 half-court basketball. Matt and Jerrod were captains; Matt selected Gavin first overall and Jerrod selected Kenny and I, leaving Bill for Matt. If you are not on my Facebook you can speculate as to who won; I will disclose it tomorrow. We bet $600/team on the game, and plan to do so for similar events (go-karting, chicken racing, relay racing) in a sort of "House Olympics".

Not much happened in the PLO8 for me. I was never over my starting stack. As expected there was some truly awful play. A hand came up where on a board of 68KT, someone bet the pot all-in, someone called so I folded my A27T, the river was a 2 and the caller scooped with QQ for high and no low. Later I tried to bluff the same opponent when I missed with J987 on a QT54T board. He called me with 99. There are people who fold in that spot in hold'em, yet I get called. Boo. Finally at 100-200 and half of my stack in the pot, I shoved my AK73 into a K96 flop and was called by Mel Judah's AA83, which held up.

When they ask five years from now where you were when you found out Michael Jackson died, Kenny can say he was playing a PLO8 tournament. I can say that I was driving Kenny Shei home after we both busted out of a PLO tournament.

I have registered for the limit shootout tomorrow. If you got table 247 and you are a good player, you should unregister.
Link6 comments|Leave a comment

Updates: Events 41, 42 and 45 [Jun. 24th, 2009|04:41 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Location |Las Vegas, NV]

I busted in just over an hour of play in Day 2 of the $10k PLHE, so as penance I will now get caught up on blogging about the last few tournaments.

So as mentioned, I got sick a couple days after the limit hold'em. I have gotten at least mildly sick at some point each of the last four World Series. It is just a gross environment with thousands of people packed into the same room, unhygienic conditions, people playing while sick, and so on.

My timing was bad since I had a friend coming from out of town, and I killed the end of last week just sitting around the house and watching movies. Our house does have a pretty solid home theatre system though. Saturday was our annual house party, which was awesome as usual, and also Iana came into town for 3 nights. Saturday night I started to feel better, so on Sunday morning I got there early to sign up for the $5000 NL Shootout.

Event 41: $5000 No-Limit Hold'em Shootout

I got to the Rio about 11 AM. I wanted to register early because I did not want to join a table comprised totally or mostly of late registrants, which are typically some of the tougher players in the field. Success: I registered and drew Table 9. I arrived at my table on time at noon and was told at that point the tournament would be delayed 30 minutes so that they could sell more seats. They then broke a whole bunch of tables and made all the shootout tables 9- or 10-handed. I really dislike it when management decides to change seating policies with no prior announcement.

Anyway, we play the whole table with a (unsold) stack blinding off in Seat 9 (the shootout is the only tournament where you cannot register late and come in with a full stack). This made for some interesting hands, like a hand when I opened in the cutoff for 1000 with the dead stack in the BB, the opponent on the button called and the SB squeezed for 3800. I held AQ. What would you do? I called and now the button insta-shoves. The SB got out of the way. I have 13000 more (he has me covered) and I call. He shows KQ and I win.

At one point we were 3-handed and I had nearly half the chips in the table, but I got a bluff called down and then ran KQ vs AQ and I had another disappointing finish. However, it is interesting that the shootout is the only format of tournament where you can go deep without cashing and not be extremely disappointed or crushed, because it only takes up a few hours to "go deep". Even if you get heads-up and lose, it often is only 4-5 hours of play. It is an extremely efficient way of playing tournament poker and definitely my favourite form (apart from heads-up).

Event 42: $2500 8-game mix

Before I start, nothing I say will be as important as the fact that Jerrod won this tournament! Which is so fitting since he is one of the few guys I know that plays and understands every game well. It is a demonstration of the idea that there are proper frameworks to think about poker that allow you to apply what you know about poker in general to specific variants of the game.

This tournament was very possibly the most value of any non-NLHE tournament in the entire WSOP. Most people played a lot of the games quite poorly. Even I only feel really strong in half of the games. At one point during the last break of the day we were all gathering around talking about hands and discussing our chip counts, and I realized that there were like 10 of us standing around talking, and we all hand decent chips -- that is so rare for the last break of the day! Also, when we were having dinner conversation, we kept sort of one-upping each other with tales of ridiculous plays that we witnessed at our table. I saw a player cold-call a completion and a raise in razz with a king up. We had players in triple draw showing down T9xxx. I busted a player in PLO when he pushed with A753 on a Q95 flop. It was awesome.

I busted in the first hour of Day 2. I was a somewhat below-average stack when we played a huge razz pot. I started (25)A against a 4, 8 and 6 and we all capped it on 3rd with one player all-in. I finally got all-in on 6th with 8542A but the guy who started with the 8 made a 64 and I failed to catch a 3.

Event 45: $10000 Pot-Limit Hold'em

I considered not playing this tournament: I figured small field and full-table pot-limit is really, really boring. But I signed up anyway. Once again I showed up on time at noon. Once again they pushed back the start of the tournament a half hour to get more players registered. Hey, Jack Effel? If everyone KNOWS the tournament is going to start a half hour late, guess what? They will only start showing up half an hour late! If you want to start the damn tournament at 12:30, start it at 12:30 -- but you might want to tell us this before 11:50, ferchristssake. Stop punishing those of us who actually give enough of a shit to show up to your tournament on time.

Anyway, I ran good at the start of the tournament, getting to double my starting stack in Level 4 without any big pots. Almost every chip I won in this tournament on Day 1 was just sort of someone deciding to give me more chips when I had a big hand. On two hands, someone decided to shove into my QQ. One was somewhat questionable and the other was terrible (he basically called my re-raise all-in preflop with 64s). Not much bad happened all day, yet I still only finished with 81600 at the end of the day. Part of it was due to some unsuccessful bluffs, part was just because I folded the last two hours (pot-limit is stupid), but most of it was because my table was extreeeeeeeemely sloooooooooooooow. We had a very slow-playing table. Until yesterday, I had not called the clock on anyone in the 2009 WSOP; yesterday I called it twice and should have called it a third time except I had just called it on the previous hand. We had the clock called probably six times at my last table. Even when the decisions weren't very big people were just playing really slow. Pot-limit hold'em is definitely a game for nitty-ass people with extremely high tolerance for boredom.

Day 2 was again short, nasty and brutish. After celebrating Jerrod's win with some late-night Korean BBQ, I overslept and did not wake up until 1:30 PM. I raced to my car without brushing my teeth or my hair and started driving. And as I got on the I-15, for the first time the entire WSOP, the 15 was backed up all the way from the 215 to Tropicana (the traffic advisory sign at Blue Diamond Boulevard said 25 minutes to Tropicana, where usually it says about 8 minutes). I detoured and zig-zagged my way to the Rio and ended up only six minutes and two hands late (luckily my Day 2 table was only slightly faster than my Day 1 table).

I won the first pot of significance I played, but after that it was just a disaster. Every time I put money into the pot I had the bottom of my range for doing so, and folded to the raise or reraise from the opponent. I finally flopped a straight with K9 out of the blind, and got paid off...by K9. Finally I shoved over Bill Chen's open-raise with 77 right into the BB's aces, and after racing down to the Rio in a vain effort to arrive on time, I was out the door an hour later.

I will probably play the $1500 PLO8 tomorrow, but what I am really looking forward to is the $1500 limit shootout on Friday evening. That tournament is the same day as the $50000 HORSE, which means I will be playing a $1500 limit shootout tournament with 200 of the best limit players in the world removed from the field. How big is my edge in that spot?!
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

updates [Jun. 24th, 2009|03:30 am]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Location |Las Vegas, NV]

I'm behind on blogging. But I was actually quite sick Wednesday-Saturday, so I took all of those days off and went back for the NL shootout on Sunday. I also played the 8-game mix on Sunday evening -- which my good friend Jerrod Ankenman just won hours ago!!! -- and made day 2 of that.

Today I played the $10k pot-limit hold'em championship event and made it through to Day 2 with 81600 chips, which is slightly below average. We return tomorrow at 2 PM with 1200-2400 blinds.

I will at some point get caught up but for more frequent updates it's best to go to twitter.com/tchanpoker
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

On poker celebdom [Jun. 17th, 2009|12:12 pm]
[Tags|, , ]
[Current Location |Las Vegas, NV]

Copied from [info]hgfalling:
Matt Hawrilenko has 800,000 chips (narrowly second) in the 10k limit holdem tournament, going into day 3. Here's what PokerNews has to say about it:

In such a stacked field we were always going to be lucky enough to find ourselves with a quality final table, as the likes of Jennifer Harman, Greg Mueller, Chad Brown, Pat Pezzin, Matt Glantz and Daniel Alaei will all return for final day action. However the man they'll have one eye on will be likely overnight chip leader, Kenny Hsiung who surged late to amass an impressive 831,000 chips.

Somebody ought to tell these people that the BEST LIMIT HOLDEM PLAYER IN THE WORLD is in 2nd place in their tournament. It's like if durr made the final table of the 5k NL and they completely ignored him to talk about Tom Schneider's eight-or-better bracelets.


I have nothing to add to this commentary, but for one thing: crush crush crush, Hoss_TBF!
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

$10k LHE: Day 2 [Jun. 16th, 2009|09:13 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Location |Las Vegas, NV]

Aaaaand I'm out. Nothing exciting to report. Just made second-best too many times; typical limit tournament poker stuff. Started off hot and finished up cold. Probably could have saved a couple bets on a hand here and a hand there; I often forget that I probably shouldn't value bet quite as thin in a tournament like this than in a tough online cash game.

Don't *think* I'm going to play the 5k PLO tomorrow. I kind of want a rest day, but Bill Chen thinks it will be a soft field on account of it being the only tournament tomorrow (why this is the case, I have no idea).
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

Event #33: $10000 Limit Hold'em [Jun. 16th, 2009|03:52 am]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Location |Las Vegas, NV]

43500 going into Day 2. My original table draw I would classify as moderately tough, but unlike last year it was not chock-full of top-level LHE specialists (not that I would know who most of those people are irl). Also in trading stories with other people in the tournament it really seemed like there were a number of fairly soft tables, which is surprising since only 185 entered, which is down from last year's number.

John Juanda's stack was drawn to our table; however, luckily for us John was busy final tabling the PLO tournament and only got to play about a dozen hands before busting. So this was great for me in two respects: the first obviously being that there's just this extra dead money in the pot on 2/9ths of the hands, and also that I played the vast majority of the day 7- or 8-handed instead of 9-handed. However it did make for some interesting dynamics when it was John's BB; no one really knows for sure what opening standards are when the big blind is not present, and what range you should 3-bet with, and so on, so we saw some really weird hands at showdown on those pots because peoples' distributions were all over the place. Chino Rheem was opening utg with stuff like J5s which I think is probably wrong, but I was also opening 3utg with stuff like Q9 and A5. Of course, pretty much every time I opened on John's blind, Lex Veldhuis 3-bet me and took it down on the flop when I hit air every time. Whine whine whine.

Speaking of dead stacks, one thing that I was upset with was that they put out a bunch of dead stacks at the beginning of the tournament which were actually unsold seats. They blinded off these stacks but then once the player bought in, their stack was replenished to 30000. I thought it was ridiculous that they did this. I asked one floorman what the rationale for this was and he was a total dick about it to Bill Edler and I, just saying, "it's the same for everyone" and walked away. However, another floorman (Kevin Ferguson) was a lot better about it and took the time to give us an explanation, namely that when the tournament started they only had 100 seats sold and they didn't want to make tables play shorthanded. This to me was still kind of lame and I still really disagree with the process, but I appreciated that Kevin was able to answer our question without being an ass about it, unlike the other guy. Anyway, one reason that this method really sucks (which Kevin admitted is a big problem with it) is that now there is no accountability with respect to the chips in the tournament. Now instead of there being 30000*185 chips in the tournament, there is 30000*185 plus some random quantity of replenished chips to the stack. And let's face it, while I do complain about the WSOP a lot, one of their biggest problems in the last couple of years has been accountability with the number of chips in play. Now with this system, they have no idea how many chips are in play and not only that, they have this automatic built-in excuse if there is found to be some large excess, which is just, "oh, well that's because we replenished stacks from players who bought in late." That, to me, is terrible and inexcusable.

On the lighter side of things, Table 233, which was located right in front of me, was the site of Fartgate. Apparently someone at the table was dropping massive bombs, the type of bombs that got the whole table to get up and leave in the middle of hands. For a while it was unclear who it was. Bill and I made a small side bet based on body language who might be the culprit. I chose one player and Bill chose another. We agreed that we would use Greg Mueller (who was at that table) to be the judge of who he thought it was, and accept that answer for the purposes of the bet. I won. Greg even gave us a thorough explanation of his breakdown, which included things like who was leaving the table, the use of hand sanitizer by certain individuals, and things of that nature. Later on in the evening as play progressed it became clear beyond any reasonable doubt who the culprit was (it was the same person Greg had fingered).

Hoss later got moved to the farty dude table and said he is a pretty bad player, but he busted towards the end of the day. Despite his fishiness I am glad for this, since we have a redraw going into tomorrow. Sometimes -- as I said to Bill early in the day -- you should be happy when you lose some poker equity for life equity.
Link6 comments|Leave a comment

Event #29: busto [Jun. 15th, 2009|02:00 am]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Location |Las Vegas, NV]

Well, that was really disappointing. John Duthie and I played a marathon round 3 matchup where we were both all-in a whole bunch of times, and the shorter stack doubled up every single time. The first time I had top pair against his flush draw+overs+gutshot and he got there; the last time was when he shoved with KQ and I called with K9s. By that time we had played almost an hour of really short-stack poker and had around 8 all-in showdowns.

I felt I played really great throughout the match. Usually playing well in a poker tournament merely consists of not doing anything too stupid, but in a heads-up or shorthanded tournament it's quite a bit different, since you have so many decisions. Late in the match with effective stacks of 15-30 BB, it's also very critical not to make even small mistakes. I thought I did a really good job in a tough spot, but I guess it wasn't my day.

It also feels worse to be knocked out of a heads-up tournament than a regular one. When you are knocked out of a regular tournament it is usually because you just played a big hand or two against any of the guys at the table. When it's heads-up, it feels so much more personal, even if it shouldn't. You don't get eliminated from a heads-up tournament, you get beaten. That seems to make it worse. Today was definitely my worst day of the WSOP thus far; I feel I had a real shot of taking it to the house.

However, John is a class act and a gentleman so at least I have someone to cheer for; and as I type this he has moved on to the semifinals.

And in other good news for me, tomorrow is the 10k limit hold'em.
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

Event #29: round 2 complete [Jun. 14th, 2009|01:11 am]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Location |Las Vegas, NV]

I am through to round 3 of the heads-up tournament. My second match was against a guy named Tommy Chen. Tommy was frustrating to play against because he was super deliberate in all of his actions, which really slowed the game and of course made it tougher to read him.

He had me down significantly very early on on the following hand at 200-400 blinds (30000 chips):

I limp with Ah6h, Tommy raises to 1800, I call.
Flop KQ7, Tommy checks, I check.
Turn A, Tommy checks, I bet 2200, Tommy raises to 6400, I call.
River is some blank, Tommy bets 8400 and I call, he shows AK.

But the match ultimately came down to this hand at 400-800:

I raise to 1600 with 8d6d, Tommy reraises to 4200, I call.
Flop 885, Tommy checks, I bet 6500, Tommy calls.
Turn A, Tommy bets 8000, I raise to 21000, Tommy calls.
River 4, Tommy checks, I bet all-in for 18900, Tommy stands up, talks to me for a while and finally calls and mucks when I show.

The rest of it was just blind stealing back and forth before he got low and shoved with K8 into my 99, which held.

Back at it at 2 PM tomorrow! One more win and I am in the money (an improvement on the ridiculous structure last year where you only had to win two matches to make the money).
LinkLeave a comment

Event #29: $10000 Heads-up NLHE [Jun. 13th, 2009|07:53 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Location |Las Vegas, NV]

A partial, but more current entry: I won my first round matchup in the 10k headsup tourney and have advanced to round 2. I led pretty much the whole way; I made a ton of pairs and thus was able to chip down my opponent pretty solidly. With a 2-1 lead, I took down a big pot with 77 on a KQ7xQ board and put my opponent under 6000 chips at 200-400. He shoved into my AK with A9 but he got lucky and chopped. However all the money went in again with his flush draw against my JT on a J-high flop, and I held.

We split our table with the Greg Mueller/Chris "Jesus" Ferguson match, which concerned me since last year the winner on one side of the table played the winner on the other side. However, I've been told by the floor that there will be a redraw from Round 2.

Also in a similar vein, amidst concerns about the registration/unregistration process, I was assured the other day by a floorman that if anyone unregistered from the heads-up event, they would not be allowed to re-register. So some credit where credit is due for the tournament staff, but hopefully they fill up the hole for all the events.

Second round is at 10 PM!
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

Event #24: $1500 NLHE [Jun. 13th, 2009|07:30 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Location |Las Vegas, NV]

I realized I didn't write about this event, but what is there to write about - another donkament where I go out relatively early. I peaked at around 14000 or so when this hand occurred at the 150-300/25 level: a middle-aged dude limps utg, I limp in middle position with 22, Rep Porter on my immediate left makes it 1600, everyone folds and we both call. Flop comes A52 rainbow, we check, Rep checks. Turn is a 4 which is the second club. UTG checks, I bet 2400, Rep calls, UTG raises to something like 8000, I shove, Rep grumbles and folds, and UTG has 33 for the wheel and fades the river.

I'm really getting tired of people who ask to see losing hands at the showdown with no real reason for doing so other than "getting information". If I got to make a change to the WSOP rulebook, I would make the reason for the existence of the called-hand-at-showdown rule much more apparent. People just don't seem to understand that "getting information" is not a valid reason for asking for a hand to be turned over. I got into it briefly with someone at my starting table, a guy in his mid-30s who I guess is a typical casual player that you get at the WSOP. He was very adamant (after some hand that was totally insignificant) that he had the right to see the mucked hand at showdown. When it was explained to him (by others; I just put on my headphones and ignored the conversation for most of it) that it was poor etiquette and that the rule is to prevent collusion, he remained unapologetic. At some point, I got sick of the bickering, and called a floorman over to explain to the table why the rule existed. Once the floorman explained that it is to prevent collusion, the guy still insisted it was his right to see the cards of his opponents at showdown. So finally I said, "so what you're telling us is, you now understand the rule, you just choose not to care."

He said, "yes, that's basically it."

*head explode*

This is also the same guy who, on a previous hand, bet the flop but checked the turn and river on a 963A7 board, turned over AJ to beat my 87, and told me, "I knew you had a straight draw. That's exactly what I put you on. Exactly."

Really? You put me on exactly this hand and somehow manage to check the turn and river in position when I would have paid you off on either street? nhs, wp. See, this is the thing about people who ask to see the losing hand at showdown to "get information". These people don't even have any idea how to *use* this information, because their fundamentals are so atrocious that all the information in the world can't make them winning players.
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

Event #22: $1500 NLHE Shootout [Jun. 10th, 2009|03:12 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Location |las Vegas, NV]

Well, that sucked. I doubled through early on when Jason Mercier tried to bluff me off the nuts[1], but everything was downhill from there. I then ran an overpair into his wheel, then called Russ Boyd's 1150 chip all-in with KQ against his 75. He made a straight to double up, then a short while later he essentially busted me when I shoved my flush draw into his nut straight. So we got all-in with both me as a 2-1 favourite and him as a 2-1 favourite, and I lost both times, which obviously means the poker gods feel Russ Boyd is a better person than I am.

I still love this event, though. Shootout is even awesomer than 6-max. I am happy at least that I was able to bust efficiently.

I will probably play the donkament tomorrow since I am not great at split-pot games (the 5 PM is mixed stud/Omaha eight-or-better).

[1] I kind of unintentionally slow-rolled him too: he checked to me, I bet 1200 and he check-raised some amount that was close to my full stack. I wasn't sure if I was re-raising or just calling the all-in, so it took me a while to call with the nuts.
Link8 comments|Leave a comment

Event 19: $2500 6-max NLHE, Day 2 [Jun. 9th, 2009|10:03 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Location |Las Vegas, NV]

Well, I now have one cash in the WSOP. It is a pretty lame cash -- 56th place and $6656 -- but considering that twice I should have been out of the tournament, I guess I will take it. I busted on a combination of the last hand before dinner and the first hand after dinner. On the hand before dinner, I bluffed off 33k trying to represent a straight on a KJT92 board; my opponent called my two-barrel with K7. First hand back from dinner, same opponent opens on the button and I shoved my last 52k with JdTd. He called with AsKs, and we both missed.

I doubled up early with QQ vs. AK. About 10 mintues later with about 27k in chips, I opened to 3200, got re-raised and jammed with 66. My opponent called with TT and the flop came an amazing T-6-6! Live poker is so rigged.

About a level later, I had a hand where I opened on the button with JhTd. Only the BB called. He had just been moved to the table and hadn't played a hand yet. The flop came KQ2 with two hearts. He checked, I bet about 5k, he check-raised to 20k and I shoved for 80k. He thought for a while with what I presumed was a bad king. Then he says, "so you're telling me you have a set of kings." I am thinking, "this makes no sense -- while it's true I could easily have a set of kings here, why would you specifically put me on that?" Then he continues his monologue: "Well, I have a set too." Gulp. Amazingly, he folded! It's possible he was just talking, but it seemed genuine. I overheard him talking to Bill Edler about the hand later and he made some comment about how "maybe I shouldn't have called with the deuces in the first place".

Wow. So that's twice I should not have cashed in this tournament. I told Bill after the 66/TT hand that I really shouldn't be in this tournament any more so anything on top is just gravy. But, of course, it's not totally true. Once you get up to 150k in chips, you start looking at building that final table stack. But oh well, it is nice to get off the goose egg.

Tomorrow: $1500 NL Shootout, yay! I have to say, the WSOP is doing a good job of scheduling things so that there i
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

Event #19: $2500 6-max NLHE, Day 1 [Jun. 9th, 2009|01:42 am]
[Tags|, ]
[Current Location |Las Vegas, NV]

This will be a pretty short report even though I had quite a few interesting hands today. Unfortunately for the readership I'm pretty tired, and I want to get up in the morning for jiujitsu and also resume play at 2 PM. Maybe I will talk about them at a later date.

I have 16,600 at the end of the day. I had a pretty phenomenal table draw near the end of the day. Men the Master was really drunk and on one hand called a 20 BB reraise with 43s. (He flopped a flush draw and made running two pair.) There was another guy who seemed spewy but was much tougher to play against because he made these really large bets and had a lot of chips. He ended up getting most of my chips on weird hands where I had like second pair or an okay draw and stuff like that where I couldn't fold or raise.

My stack size was pretty up and down all day. In most of the WSOP this year I have been grinding away small pots. Today I was all-in a bunch of times and had other people all-in a bunch of times. Lots of big pots. Also, although I was below average for most of the day, the tournament played really deep (as all 6-max NL tournaments do) and I was often below average with like 35 BB. It bears repeating: 6-max tournaments are better than full table tournaments, and if you do not prefer them you are a bad person.

Also on the plus side: I won my first sizeable coin flip of the 2009 WSOP: I got my last 20k in with 99 vs KQ, and it held!

Anyway, something like 130 players left, 108 get paid. It would be nice to quadruple up early tomorrow.
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]